Publication | Closed Access
Scalable detection of semantic clones
327
Citations
18
References
2008
Year
Unknown Venue
EngineeringVerificationOntology VersioningSoftware EngineeringSource Code AnalysisSemantic WebSemanticsFormal VerificationSoftware AnalysisNatural Language ProcessingSemantic InformationData ScienceSemantic ApproachComputational LinguisticsScalable DetectionProgram TransformationLanguage StudiesMachine TranslationDependency AnalysisControl DependenciesKnowledge DiscoveryProgram DesignComputer ScienceCode RepresentationStatic Program AnalysisSoftware DesignContent Similarity DetectionProgram AnalysisSoftware TestingFormal Methods
Several techniques have been developed for identifying similar code fragments in programs. These similar fragments, referred to as code clones, can be used to identify redundant code, locate bugs, or gain insight into program design. Existing scalable approaches to clone detection are limited to finding program fragments that are similar only in their contiguous syntax. Other, semantics-based approaches are more resilient to differences in syntax, such as reordered statements, related statements interleaved with other unrelated statements, or the use of semantically equivalent control structures. However, none of these techniques have scaled to real world code bases. These approaches capture semantic information from Program Dependence Graphs (PDGs), program representations that encode data and control dependencies between statements and predicates. Our definition of a code clone is also based on this representation: we consider program fragments with isomorphic PDGs to be clones. In this paper, we present the first scalable clone detection algorithm based on this definition of semantic clones. Our insight is the reduction of the difficult graph similarity problem to a simpler tree similarity problem by mapping carefully selected PDG subgraphs to their related structured syntax. We efficiently solve the tree similarity problem to create a scalable analysis. We have implemented this algorithm in a practical tool and performed evaluations on several million-line open source projects, including the Linux kernel. Compared with previous approaches, our tool locates significantly more clones, which are often more semantically interesting than simple copied and pasted code fragments.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1