Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2014 · 13 citations · 5 references
Open access
HumanitiesAnimal SciencesEthicsMoral PsychologyTheory Of JusticeAnimal Decision-makingAnimal EthicsAnimal StudiesHuman-animal RelationsMoral ResponsibilityNormative EthicsMoral Considerability Of AnimalsMoral Consideration For NatureMoral Status Of AnimalsNonhuman Primate EthicsRights-based Animal Ethics
This paper assesses the implications of egalitarianism and prioritarianism for the consideration of nonhuman animals. These implications have been often overlooked. The paper argues that neither egalitarianism nor prioritarianism can consistently deprive nonhuman animals of moral consideration. If you really are an egalitarian (or a prioritarian) you are necessarily committed both to the rejection of speciesism and to assigning priority to the interests of nonhuman animals, since they are the worst-off. From this, important practical consequences follow for the improvement of the current situation of nonhuman animals.
5
Frontiers of justice: disability, nationality, species membership
Choice Reviews Online · 2006 · 3.8K citations · Full text
Of Mice and Men: Equality and Animals
Peter Vallentyne · The Journal of Ethics · 2005 · 63 citations
Animal rights: a philosophical defence
Choice Reviews Online · 1999 · 47 citations