Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · 2005 · 13 citations · 29 references
MedicineOphthalmologySurgeryClinical Vision ScienceOphthalmic SurgeryRefractive SurgeryIntraocular Pressure MeasurementPreoperative Refractive EvaluationBland-altman PlotGoldmann Applanation TonometryIntraocular Pressure AssessmentIntraocular Pressure ReductionNon-contact TonometryPaired Sample TestPaired T-testPostoperative Intraocular Pressure Measurement
PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) assessment in post-LASIK patients using non-contact tonometry, pressure phosphene tonometry and applanation tonometry. METHODS: Sixty-two consecutive LASIK patients were analysed preoperatively and postoperatively with non-contact, pressure phosphene and applanation tonometry. Comparisons among these values were assessed with paired sample Student t-test, Pearson's correlation test and Bland-Altman plotting. RESULTS: There was no significant difference for preoperative IOP measurement between non-contact, pressure phosphene and applanation tonometry. The mean +/-SD difference between the preoperative non-contact tonometry and postoperative pressure phosphene tonometry IOP measurements was 0.80 +/- 2.77 mmHg (P < 0.01). Postoperative applanation tonometry significantly underestimated IOP measurement by 5.45 +/- 2.96 mmHg (P < 0.001) and postoperative non-contact tonometry significantly underestimated IOP measurement by 9.96 +/- 2.25 mmHg (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pressure phosphene tonometry may provide an alternative method for the assessment of IOP in post-LASIK patients.
29
A H BECKETT, M ROWLAND, P TURNER · The Lancet · 1965 · 16.9K citations
Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India
Rengappa Ramakrishnan, Praveen K. Nirmalan, R Krishnadas et al. · Ophthalmology · 2003 · 397 citations