Dealing with Similarity Relations in Fuzzy Ontologies

Afef Bahri, Rafik Bouaziz, Faı̈ez Gargouri

Proceedings of ... IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems · 2007 · 14 citations · 12 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Crisp ontologies fail when concepts are imprecise, so similarity relations among fuzzy ontology components—derived from linguistic or intensional definitions—are crucial for reuse, query rewriting, and modeling. This paper develops fuzzy ontologies to address the inadequacy of crisp ontologies and focuses on handling similarity relations among fuzzy ontology components. The authors distinguish crisp and fuzzy treatments of similarity: crisp ontologies use binary relations, while fuzzy ontologies assign a degree of similarity to component pairs.

Abstract

Crisp ontologies become less suitable in all domains in which the concepts to be represented have imprecise definitions. Fuzzy ontologies are developed to overcome this problem. Determining similarity relations among fuzzy ontology components is essential for many reuse subprocesses, for query rewriting as well as for fuzzy ontology modeling. Denning similarity relations within fuzzy context may be realized basing on the linguistic similarity among ontology components or may be deduced from their intensional definitions. The later approach needs to be dealt with differently in crisp and fuzzy ontologies. In the first case, two ontology components are related by a given similarity relation or not. In the second one, two ontology components have a degree to be related by a given similarity relation. This is the scope of this paper.

References

12