The Fusiform “Face Area” is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level

Michael J. Tarr, Jill Moylan, Pawel Skudlarski, John C. Gore, Adam W. Anderson

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · 2000 · 863 citations · 39 references

TL;DR

Modular models of cortical organization posit that many extrastriate areas are dedicated to specific object categories and assume an early stage for detecting category membership. The study aims to determine whether functional imaging can isolate category‑specific areas that support detection of category members by examining responses in two face‑selective and one letter‑selective region. The authors examined responses in two face‑selective and one letter‑selective extrastriate regions to assess category‑detection capability. The face‑selective and letter‑selective regions showed exemplar‑specific habituation only for their preferred category, indicating that these areas perform more complex processing at the individual level, with face regions contributing to individual face perception and letter regions tuning to font information for efficient recognition.

Abstract

Abstract According to modular models of cortical organization, many areas of the extrastriate cortex are dedicated to object categories. These models often assume an early processing stage for the detection of category membership. Can functional imaging isolate areas responsible for detection of members of a category, such as faces or letters? We consider whether responses in three different areas (two selective for faces and one selective for letters) support category detection. Activity in these areas habituates to the repeated presentation of one exemplar more than to the presentation of different exemplars of the same category, but only for the category for which the area is selective. Thus, these areas appear to play computational roles more complex than detection, processing stimuli at the individual level. Drawing from prior work, we suggest that face-selective areas may be involved in the perception of faces at the individual level, whereas letter-selective regions may be tuning themselves to font information in order to recognize letters more efficiently.

References

39