The Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and Capital‐Market Behavior: Early Evidence*

Pankaj Jain, Zabihollah Rezaee

Contemporary Accounting Research · 2006 · 237 citations · 21 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The Sarbanes‑Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted in response to widespread corporate and accounting scandals. It was designed to strengthen corporate accountability and professional responsibility to restore investor confidence in corporate America. The study finds that market reactions to the Act are generally positive when events increase its likelihood, negative when they decrease it, and that firms with higher pre‑enactment compliance experience stronger positive abnormal returns, indicating that the Act’s benefits outweigh its costs.

Abstract

Abstract The Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 (“the Act”) was enacted in response to numerous corporate and accounting scandals. It aims to reinforce corporate accountability and professional responsibility in order to restore investor confidence in corporate America. This study examines the capital‐market reaction to the Act and finds a positive (negative) abnormal return at the time of several legislative events that increased (decreased) the likelihood of the passage of the Act. We interpret this finding as evidence supporting the notion that the Act is wealth‐increasing in the sense that its induced benefits significantly outweigh its imposed compliance costs. We also find that the market reaction is more positive for firms that are more compliant with the provisions of the Act prior to its enactment.

References

21