Publication | Closed Access
Testing the basin-centered gas accumulation model using fluid inclusion observations: Southern Piceance Basin, Colorado
154
Citations
45
References
2012
Year
EngineeringGeomorphologyFracture GrowthWell StimulationPetrologyNatural Gas HydrateEarth ScienceDrillingPetroleum ReservoirFluid PropertiesBasin AnalysisGas ChargeGas Field DevelopmentBasin EvolutionFluid Inclusion ObservationsSubsurface HydrologyGeographyGeologyFractured Reservoir EngineeringGas HydrateFormation DamageHydrologyRock PropertiesWater ResourcesStructural GeologyNatural Gas Hydrate SystemPiceance BasinGeomechanicsSouthern Piceance BasinGeochemistryReservoir GeologyPetroleum Engineering
The Upper Cretaceous Mesaverde Group in the Piceance Basin, Colorado, is considered a continuous basin-centered gas accumulation in which gas charge of the low-permeability sandstone occurs under high pore-fluid pressure in response to gas generation. High gas pressure favors formation of pervasive systems of opening-mode fractures. This view contrasts with thatofothermodelsoflow-permeabilitygasreservoirsinwhich gas migrates by buoyant drive and accumulates in conventional traps, with fractures an incidental attribute of these reservoirs. We tested the aspects of the basin-centered gas accumulation model as it applies to the Piceance Basin by determining the timing of fracturegrowth and associated temperature,pressure, and fluid-composition conditions using microthermometry and Raman microspectrometry of fluid inclusions trapped in fracture cement that formed during fracture growth. Trapping temperatures of methane-saturated aqueous fluid inclusions record systematic temperature trends that increase from approximately 140 to 185°C and then decrease to approximately 158°C over time, which indicates fracture growth during maximum burial conditions. Calculated pore-fluid pressures for methanerich aqueous inclusions of 55 to 110 MPa (7977–15,954 psi) indicate fracture growth under near-lithostatic pressure conditions consistent with fracture growth during active gas maturation and charge. Lack of systematic pore-fluid–pressure trends
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1