Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2003 · 226 citations · 74 references
Social SciencesPsychologySocial PsychologyExperimental PsychologySocial CognitionSocial ComparisonBiasSelf-evaluation ProcessesSocial EvaluationSocial JudgmentSocial PreferencesUpward Social ComparisonComparison ProcessesConsensusConsensus EffectsFalse Consensus EffectSocial Prediction
Four experiments explored the psychological processes by which people make comparative social judgments. Each participant chose how much money to wager on beating an opponent on either a difficult or a simple trivia quiz. Quiz difficulty did not influence the average person's probability of winning, yet participants bet more on a simple quiz than on a difficult quiz in the first 3 experiments. The results suggest that this effect results from a tendency to attend more closely to a focal actor than to others. Experiment 4 directly manipulated focusing; when participants were led to focus on the opponent instead of themselves, the effect was reversed. The discussion relates the results to other literatures including overly optimistic self-evaluation, false consensus, overconfidence, and social comparison.
74
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman · 1975 · 23.1K citations
A Theory of Social Comparison Processes
Léon Festinger · Human Relations · 1954 · 20.3K citations
Amos Tversky · Psychological Review · 1977 · 7.3K citations
Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory.
David Willer, John Turner, Michael A. Hogg et al. · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · 1989 · 7.2K citations