Concepedia

COMPARISON OF 2 GENERATIONS OF PIEZOELECTRIC LITHOTRIPTORS USING MATCHED PAIR ANALYSIS

Chi‐Fai Ng, L. McLornan, TheodoreR. Thompson, David A. Tolley

The Journal of Urology · 2004 · 36 citations · 14 references

DOI

Abstract

Despite significant design changes and technical modifications, the new piezoelectric lithotriptor does not appear to provide a better treatment outcome than the older generation machine.

References

14

Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 4th edn

D. Purdie · Internal Medicine Journal · 2003 · 493 citations

, , +4

Relationship of Spontaneous Passage of Ureteral Calculi to Stone Size and Location as Revealed by Unenhanced Helical CT

Deirdre M. Coll, Michael J. Varanelli, Robert C. Smith · American Journal of Roentgenology · 2002 · 475 citations

LOWER CALICEAL STONE CLEARANCE AFTER SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY OR URETEROSCOPY: THE IMPACT OF LOWER POLE RADIOGRAPHIC ANATOMY

ABDELHAMID M. ELBAHNASY, Arieh L. Shalhav, David M. Hoenig et al. · The Journal of Urology · 1998 · 306 citations

Efficacy of Second Generation Lithotriptors: A Multicenter Comparative Study of 2,206 Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Treatments with the Siemens Lithostar, Dornier HM4, Wolf Piezolith 2300, Direx Tripter X-1 and Breakstone Lithotriptors

A.F. Bierkens, Ad J.M. Hendrikx, V.J.W. de Kort et al. · The Journal of Urology · 1992 · 120 citations

Clearance of Lower-Pole Stones following Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Effect of the Infundibulopelvic Angle

Francis X. Keeley, Sami A. Moussa, Gordon Smith et al. · European Urology · 1999 · 94 citations

, ,