British Journal of Radiology · 2014 · 11 citations · 13 references
MedicineRadiation OncologyRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyTreatment PlanningBladder ImagingImage Quality AssessmentMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingProstate Cancer ImagingProstate ImagingDeformationImage Distortion ReductionImage Quality MetricsIntensity ReductionProstate Imaging AnatomyRadiotherapy Simulation Positioning
OBJECTIVE: To eliminate the effects of body deformation for MR-based prostate treatment planning, coil mounts are essential. In this study, we evaluated the effect of the coil set-up on image quality. METHODS: A custom-designed pelvic-shaped phantom was scanned by systematically increasing the anterior body-to-coil (BTC) distance from 30 to 90 mm. The image quality near the organs of interest was determined in order to characterize the relationship between image quality and BTC distance at the critical organ structures. The half intensity reduction (HIR) was calculated to determine the sensitivity of each organ structure to the BTC distance change. RESULTS: As the BTC distance increased, the uniformity reduced at 3% per millimetre. The HIR value indicated that the bladder signal is most sensitive to the change in BTC distance. By maintaining a constant BTC distance set-up, the intensity uniformity was improved by 28% along the B0 directions. CONCLUSION: Positioning the MRI coil on mounts can reduce body deformation but adversely degrades the image quality. The magnitude of this effect has been quantified for prostate MR simulation scanning. The coil needs to be positioned not only with a minimal but also uniform BTC distance in order to maximize image quality. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: A method to characterize the effect on image quality due to the use of coil mounts was demonstrated. Coil mounts whose height can be adjusted individually to keep BTC distance constant are necessary to maintain a uniform image across the entire field of view.
13
J J W Lagendijk, Bas W. Raaymakers, Alexander Raaijmakers et al. · Radiotherapy and Oncology · 2007 · 509 citations
Jason Dowling, Jonathan Lambert, J. W. Parker et al. · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2012 · 313 citations