Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 315 citations · 27 references
MedicineBiostatisticsOncologyBreast OncologyMetastasisSurvival AnalysisBiomarker-guided Therapy SelectionBreast Cancer OncologyBreast Cancer RecurrenceBreast-conserving TherapyCancer BiomarkersCancer Survival AnalysisBreast Cancer PrognosisCancer Metastasis BiomarkersCancer Prognostic ModelingLocal Recurrence DetectionLocal Tumor RecurrencePrognostic Expression SignaturesRecurrence After Breast-conserving SurgeryTumor-node-metastasis Staging
PURPOSE: To determine the clinical utility of intrinsic molecular phenotype after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) with lumpectomy and whole-breast irradiation with or without a cavity boost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred ninety-eight patients with invasive breast cancer were enrolled into a randomized trial of BCT with or without a tumor bed radiation boost. Tumors were classified by intrinsic molecular phenotype as luminal A or B, HER-2, basal-like, or unclassified using a five-biomarker panel: estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2, CK5/6, and epidermal growth factor receptor. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards methodology were used to ascertain relationships to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and death from breast cancer. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 84 months. Three hundred ninety-four patients were classified as luminal A, 23 were luminal B, 52 were basal, 13 were HER-2, and 16 were unclassified. There were 24 IBTR (4.8%), 35 LRR (7%), 47 distant metastases (9.4%), and 37 breast cancer deaths (7.4%). The overall 5-year disease-free rates for the whole cohort were: IBTR 97.4%, LRR 95.6%, DDFS 92.9%, and breast cancer-specific death 96.3%. A significant difference was observed for survival between subtypes for LRR (P = .012), DDFS (P = .0035), and breast cancer-specific death (P = .0482), but not for IBTR (P = .346). CONCLUSION: The 5-year and 10-year survival rates varied according to molecular subtype. Although this approach provides additional information to predict time to IBTR, LRR, DDFS, and death from breast cancer, its predictive power is less than that of traditional pathologic indices. This information may be useful in discussing outcomes and planning management with patients after BCT.
27
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Charles M. Perou, Thérese Sørlie, Michael B. Eisen et al. · Nature · 2000 · 16.3K citations
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
Marc J. van de Vijver, Yudong D. He, Laura van ‘t Veer et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 6.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Bioinformatics, Oncology +17
A Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Soonmyung Paik, Steven Shak, Gong Tang et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2004 · 6.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Breast Oncology +12
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Clinical Features and Patterns of Recurrence
Rebecca Dent, Maureen Trudeau, Kathleen I. Pritchard et al. · Clinical Cancer Research · 2007 · 5.1K citations · Full text