Prenatal Diagnosis · 2014 · 53 citations · 18 references
Life SciencesGeneticsMolecular GeneticsGenomicsHuman GeneticsPrenatal DiagnosisFetal AnomaliesFetal Anomaly DetectionPrenatal CytogeneticsPrenatal Genetic DiagnosisPrenatal Molecular TestingVariant InterpretationChromosomal Microarray AnalysisDiagnostic Test YieldDiagnostic Yield AssessmentPrenatal Chromosomal Microarray AnalysisPrenatal Detection Of Copy Number VariantsPrenatal Molecular DiagnosisStructural Fetal AnomaliesVariant Interpretation In Prenatal Genetics
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine for the first time the reliability and the diagnostic power of high-resolution microarray testing in routine prenatal diagnostics. METHODS: We applied high-resolution chromosomal microarray testing in 464 cytogenetically normal prenatal samples with any indication for invasive testing. RESULTS: High-resolution testing revealed a diagnostic yield of 6.9% and 1.6% in cases of fetal ultrasound anomalies and cases of advanced maternal age (AMA), respectively, which is similar to previous studies using low-resolution microarrays. In three (0.6%) additional cases with an indication of AMA, an aberration in susceptibility risk loci was detected. Moreover, one case (0.2%) showed an X-linked aberration in a female fetus, a finding relevant for future family planning. We found the rate of cases, in which the parents had to be tested for interpretation of unreported copy number variants (3.7%), and the rate of remaining variants of unknown significance (0.4%) acceptably low. Of note, these findings did not cause termination of pregnancy after expert genetic counseling. The 0.4% rate of confined placental mosaicism was similar to that observed by conventional karyotyping and notably involved a case of placental microdeletion. CONCLUSION: High-resolution prenatal microarray testing is a reliable technique that increases diagnostic yield by at least 17.3% when compared with conventional karyotyping, without an increase in the frequency of variants of uncertain significance.
18
Chromosomal Microarray versus Karyotyping for Prenatal Diagnosis
Ronald J. Wapner, Brynn Levy, Blake C. Ballif et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Genetics, Obstetrics +17
CNVs conferring risk of autism or schizophrenia affect cognition in controls
Hreinn Stefánsson, Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg, Stacy Steinberg et al. · Nature · 2013 · 732 citations · Full text
Medicine, Neuroscience, Psychiatry +11
Ron Hochstenbach, Ellen van Binsbergen, J.J.M. Engelen et al. · European Journal of Medical Genetics · 2009 · 283 citations