Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 240 citations · 46 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyBreast OncologyBreast Radiation OncologySurgical OncologyBreast Cancer RadiotherapyBreast Cancer RecurrenceBreast SurgeryBreast-conserving TherapyDuctal Carcinoma In SituBreast-conserving RadiotherapyMargin Status EvaluationPost-mastectomy RadiotherapyPrognostic Subgroup AnalysisRadiation BoostRadiotherapy After Breast-conserving SurgeryRecurrence After Breast-conserving SurgeryTumor Margin Status
PURPOSE: To investigate the long-term impact of pathologic characteristics and an extra boost dose of 16 Gy on local relapse, for stage I and II invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conserving therapy (BCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer boost versus no boost trial, after whole breast irradiation, patients with microscopically complete excision of invasive tumor, were randomly assigned to receive or not an extra boost dose of 16 Gy. For a subset of 1,616 patients central pathology review was performed. RESULTS: The 10-year cumulative risk of local breast cancer relapse as a first event was not significantly influenced if the margin was scored negative, close or positive for invasive tumor or ductal carcinoma in situ according to central pathology review (log-rank P = .45 and P = .57, respectively). In multivariate analysis, high-grade invasive ductal carcinoma was associated with an increased risk of local relapse (P = .026; hazard ratio [HR], 1.67), as was age younger than 50 years (P < .0001; HR, 2.38). The boost dose of 16 Gy significantly reduced the local relapse rate (P = .0006; HR, 0.47). For patients younger than 50 years old and in patients with high grade invasive ductal carcinoma, the boost dose reduced the local relapse from 19.4% to 11.4% (P = .0046; HR, 0.51) and from 18.9% to 8.6% (P = .01; HR, 0.42), respectively. CONCLUSION: Young age and high-grade invasive ductal cancer were the most important risk factors for local relapse, while margin status had no significant influence. A boost dose of 16 Gy significantly reduced the negative effects of both young age and high-grade invasive cancer.
46
Bernard Fisher, Stewart Anderson, John Bryant et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 6.2K citations · Full text
Bernard Fisher, Stewart Anderson, Carol Redmond et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1995 · 1.5K citations · Full text