Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2014 · 101 citations · 36 references
Life SciencesBioinformaticsOncologyCancer GeneticsMolecular OncologyMulti-omics IntegrationCancer GenomicsComputational OncologyGenomic Data IntegrationGenomics IntegrationMulti-omics Data FusionOmics IntegrationBiomedical Knowledge Graph ConstructionClinical Outcome MeasurementCopy Number Alteration AnalysisGene Expression SignaturesGraph-based Data IntegrationIntegrated Multi-omics AnalysisMulti-omics Predictive ModelingOutcome Prediction
OBJECTIVE: Cancer can involve gene dysregulation via multiple mechanisms, so no single level of genomic data fully elucidates tumor behavior due to the presence of numerous genomic variations within or between levels in a biological system. We have previously proposed a graph-based integration approach that combines multi-omics data including copy number alteration, methylation, miRNA, and gene expression data for predicting clinical outcome in cancer. However, genomic features likely interact with other genomic features in complex signaling or regulatory networks, since cancer is caused by alterations in pathways or complete processes. METHODS: Here we propose a new graph-based framework for integrating multi-omics data and genomic knowledge to improve power in predicting clinical outcomes and elucidate interplay between different levels. To highlight the validity of our proposed framework, we used an ovarian cancer dataset from The Cancer Genome Atlas for predicting stage, grade, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Integrating multi-omics data with genomic knowledge to construct pre-defined features resulted in higher performance in clinical outcome prediction and higher stability. For the grade outcome, the model with gene expression data produced an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.7866. However, models of the integration with pathway, Gene Ontology, chromosomal gene set, and motif gene set consistently outperformed the model with genomic data only, attaining AUCs of 0.7873, 0.8433, 0.8254, and 0.8179, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating multi-omics data and genomic knowledge to improve understanding of molecular pathogenesis and underlying biology in cancer should improve diagnostic and prognostic indicators and the effectiveness of therapies.
36
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Todd R. Golub, Donna K. Slonim, Pablo Tamayo et al. · Science · 1999 · 11.6K citations
Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca L. Siegel, Elizabeth Ward et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2009 · 9.7K citations · Full text
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
Laura van ‘t Veer, Hongyue Dai, Marc J. van de Vijver et al. · Nature · 2002 · 9.6K citations · Full text
Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer