Open Chemistry · 2010 · 11 citations · 14 references
Natural SciencesEnvironmental EngineeringEnvironmental SciencesEnvironmental ChemistryEnvironmental RemediationGeochemistryAdsorption ProcessesCation Exchange CapacityHeavy Metal ContaminationSediment ChemistrySediment CompositionSediment RemediationAdsorption To SedimentsAqueous Phase CompositionBiosorptionMercury RemediationMercury RemovalPh DependencePh Effects On Metal RemovalTrace Metal Adsorption
Abstract Abiotic parameters (pH, temperature, current velocity, mercury species concentration, and sediment and aqueous media composition) influence mercury species (MeHg+, EtHg+, PhHg+ and inorganic Hg2+) adsorption on river sediments. The highest amount of adsorbed MeHg+ and EtHg+ (82–93% and 85–91% for static and agitated system, respectively) occurred at pH 3–4. For PhHg+ the maximum adsorption (90% and 95% for static and agitated systems) was located over the broad 3–10 pH range, while for Hg2+ (94% and 97% for static and agitated systems) it was at pH ∼ 3. Temperature (4.5–60°C) influenced the adsorption rate but not the quantity. Both rate and quantity increased in the order: static 2+ adsorption about 67%. Cations at pH 5.2 reduced either the adsorption rate (Ca2+, Al3+) or the total adsorption (Zn2+, Fe3+). Positive correlations were found between sediment C, N, S content as well as cation exchange capacity (CEC) with mercury adsorption (R = 0.45–0.66, 0.56–0.89, 0.45–0.61 and 0.55–0.73, respectively) while negative correlations were observed with Fe and Al (R = −0.63 to −0.90 and −0.65 to −0.86, respectively).
14
Kinetics of Mercury(II) Adsorption and Desorption on Soil
Yujun Yin, Herbert E. Allen, Chin‐Pao Huang et al. · Environmental Science & Technology · 1997 · 218 citations
Mercury baseline levels in Flemish soils (Belgium)
Filip Tack, Thomas Vanhaesebroeck, Marc Verloo et al. · Environmental Pollution · 2004 · 120 citations · Full text