Primary cervical cancer screening with human papillomavirus: End of study results from the ATHENA study using HPV as the first-line screening test

Thomas C. Wright, Mark H. Stoler, Catherine Behrens, Abha Sharma, Guili Zhang, Teresa L. Wright

Gynecologic Oncology · 2015 · 584 citations · 23 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

ATHENA evaluated the cobas HPV Test as the primary cervical cancer screening method for women aged 25 and older. The study reports 3‑year end‑of‑study results comparing HPV primary screening to various screening and triage strategies in 42,209 women aged 25 and older. Women with abnormal cytology or HPV positivity were referred to colposcopy, and those without CIN2+ entered a 3‑year follow‑up with cumulative incidence rates of CIN3+ reported for cytology‑negative, HPV‑negative, and combined negative groups. HPV primary screening achieved higher sensitivity (76.1%) and comparable specificity (93.5%) for CIN3+ than cytology (47.8%/97.1%) or hybrid strategy (61.7%/94.6%), detecting more CIN3+ cases but with a similar colposcopy‑to‑CIN3+ ratio as the hybrid approach, and it required fewer screening tests overall.

Abstract

ATHENA evaluated the cobas HPV Test as the primary screen for cervical cancer in women ≥25years. This reports the 3-year end-of-study results comparing the performance of HPV primary screening to different screening and triage combinations.42,209 women ≥25years were enrolled and had cytology and hrHPV testing. Women with abnormal cytology (≥atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) and those HPV positive were referred to colposcopy. Women not reaching the study endpoint of CIN2+ entered the 3-year follow-up phase.3-year CIR of CIN3+ in cytology-negative women was 0.8% (95% CI; 0.5-1.1%), 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.7%) in HPV-negative women, and 0.3% (95% CI; 0.1-0.6%) in cytology and HPV negative women. The sensitivity for CIN3+ of cytology was 47.8% (95% CI; 41.6-54.1%) compared to 61.7% (95% CI; 56.0-67.5%) for the hybrid strategy (cytology if 25-29years and cotesting with cytology and HPV if ≥30years) and 76.1% (95% CI; 70.3-81.8%) for HPV primary. The specificity for CIN3+ was 97.1% (95% CI; 96.9-97.2%), 94.6% (95% CI; 94.4-94.8%), and 93.5% (95% CI; 93.3-93.8%) for cytology, hybrid strategy, and HPV primary, respectively. Although HPV primary detects significantly more cases of CIN3+ in women ≥25years than either cytology or hybrid strategy, it requires significantly more colposcopies. However, the number of colposcopies required to detect a single CIN3+ is the same as for the hybrid strategy.HPV primary screening in women ≥25years is as effective as a hybrid screening strategy that uses cytology if 25-29years and cotesting if ≥30years. However, HPV primary screening requires less screening tests.

References

23