PubMed · 2000 · 35 citations · 3 references
MedicineCardiologyNuclear MedicineCardiac Nuclear MedicineDiagnostic ImagingNuclear CardiologyAttenuation CorrectionCardiovascular ImagingCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Artery ImagingIschemic Heart DiseaseMyocardial Perfusion ImagingCoronary Artery Stenosis AssessmentCoronary Stenosis AssessmentDiagnostic Performance MetricsDipyridamole Stress ImagingIncremental Diagnostic ValueMyocardial Perfusion ScintigraphyOperating Characteristic CurvesSpect Attenuation Correction
UNLABELLED: Either gated myocardial perfusion SPECT or attenuation-corrected SPECT can be used to improve specificity in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD). We investigated whether attenuation-noncorrected gating and ungated attenuation correction could improve the diagnostic performance of rest/stress perfusion SPECT in patients having an intermediate pretest likelihood of CAD. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients (29 men, 39 women; mean age, 59 +/- 12 y) with coronary artery stenosis > or =70% (1 vessel, n = 13; 2 vessels, n = 18; 3 vessels, n = 8; normal, n = 29) underwent rest attenuation-corrected 201TI SPECT and dipyridamole stress gated attenuation-corrected 99mTc-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile SPECT with an ADAC vertex camera. Three physicians graded the post-test likelihood of CAD for each arterial territory using a 5-point scale (1, normal; 2, possibly normal; 3, equivocal; 4, possibly abnormal; 5, abnormal). The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under receiver-operating-characteristic curves were compared for each operator by 3 methods: attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT, gated poststress SPECT plus attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT, and attenuation-corrected rest/stress SPECT plus gated poststress SPECT plus attenuation-noncorrected rest/stress SPECT. RESULTS: When higher than grade 3 was used as the criterion for CAD, no differences in sensitivity and specificity were found among the 3 methods for each operator. Areas under receiver-operating-characteristic curves for the diagnosis of CAD and stenosis revealed no differences for each modality (P > 0.05 for each comparison). CONCLUSION: In patients with an intermediate risk of CAD, viewing attenuation-noncorrected gated poststress SPECT and ungated attenuation-corrected rest/stress SPECT images did not improve the diagnostic performance for CAD and stenosis.
3
Daniel S. Berman, Rory Hachamovitch, Hosen Kiat et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 1995 · 590 citations
Simultaneous Transmission/Emission Myocardial Perfusion Tomography
Edward P. Ficaro, Jeffrey A. Fessler, Paul Shreve et al. · Circulation · 1996 · 313 citations
Regine Kluge, Bernhard Sattler, Anita Seese et al. · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · 1997 · 86 citations