The Astrophysical Journal · 1998 · 1.1K citations · 42 references
Natural SciencesAstronomyPhysicsAstrophysicsInterstellar MediumRadiation TransportComputational AstrophysicsCosmic-ray InteractionsGalactic HaloHigh-energy Astrophysical SourcesInterstellar Radiation FieldConvectionCosmic-ray DiffusionCosmic-ray Energy LossesCosmic-ray ReaccelerationCosmic-ray Source DistributionsDiffusion ModelsEnergy DependenceRadiation Field Modeling
The study presents a numerical method for computing the propagation of primary and secondary nucleons, primary electrons, and secondary positrons and electrons. The method incorporates realistic interstellar gas and radiation field distributions, accounts for fragmentation, energy losses, and diffusive reacceleration, calibrates to observed B/C and 10Be/9Be ratios, sets an upper limit on convection velocity gradients, and provides full numerical solution details. The results show that diffusion–convection models poorly reproduce the B/C energy dependence, whereas reacceleration models fit it well, yielding halo heights >4 kpc for diffusion/convection and 4–12 kpc for reacceleration, and indicating a broader radial distribution of cosmic‑ray sources than current supernova remnant estimates.
We describe a method for the numerical computation of the propagation of primary and secondary nucleons, primary electrons, and secondary positrons and electrons. Fragmentation and energy losses are computed using realistic distributions for the interstellar gas and radiation fields, and diffusive reacceleration is also incorporated. The models are adjusted to agree with the observed cosmic-ray B/C and 10Be/9Be ratios. Models with diffusion and convection do not account well for the observed energy dependence of B/C, while models with reacceleration reproduce this easily. The height of the halo propagation region is determined, using recent 10Be/9Be measurements, as >4 kpc for diffusion/convection models and 4-12 kpc for reacceleration models. For convection models we set an upper limit on the velocity gradient of dV/dz < 7 km/s/kpc. The radial distribution of cosmic-ray sources required is broader than current estimates of the SNR distribution for all halo sizes. Full details of the numerical method used to solve the cosmic-ray propagation equation are given.
42
Solar Modulation of Galactic Cosmic Rays
L. J. Gleeson, W. I. Axford · The Astrophysical Journal · 1968 · 1.2K citations
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +14
Bremsstrahlung Cross-Section Formulas and Related Data
H. W. Koch, J. W. Motz · Reviews of Modern Physics · 1959 · 1.1K citations
Production and Propagation of Cosmic‐Ray Positrons and Electrons
The Astrophysical Journal · 1998 · 761 citations · Full text
EGRET Observations of the Diffuse Gamma‐Ray Emission from the Galactic Plane
S. D. Hunter, D. L. Bertsch, J. R. Catelli et al. · The Astrophysical Journal · 1997 · 730 citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Astronomy, Physics +17