International Journal of Oil Gas and Coal Technology · 2014 · 25 citations · 0 references
Natural SciencesChemistryEarth SciencesEnvironmental RemediationGreen ChemistryWater TreatmentOrganic Contaminant RemovalWater Treatment ChemistryCake FiltrationFilter Cake CompatibilityFilter Cake PermeabilityFilter Cake WashingRetained PermeabilityWater Removal
Chelate solutions, GLDA (pH of 3.3 to 13) and HEDTA (pH of 4 and 7) were incompatible with α-amylase over a wide range of temperatures. GLDA (pH 3.3) and HEDTA (pH 4) can be used to remove the filter cake in one step. GLDA (20 wt% in a 200 g solution and pH of 3.3) and HEDTA (20 wt% in a 200 g solution and pH 4) had 100% removal efficiency of the filter cake. The retained permeability was 110% and 106% for Berea sandstone and Indiana limestone cores, respectively when using GLDA (13.3 wt% in 300 g solution and pH of 3.3). The retained permeability was 115% and 100% for Berea sandstone and Indiana limestone cores, respectively when using HEDTA (20 wt% in 200 g solution and pH of 3.3). No core damage was observed when using GLDA and HEDTA solutions as a breaker to remove water-based filter cake.