Publication | Closed Access
International survey on willingness‐to‐pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness?
677
Citations
12
References
2009
Year
Wtp ValuesCost-effectiveness PlanePreventive MedicineEconomic AnalysisPublic HealthInternational SurveyDecision MakingHealth Services ResearchConsumer ChoiceEconomicsPublic PolicyHealth PolicyAdditional QalyHealth InsuranceOutcomes ResearchPharmacoeconomicsCost EffectivenessHealthcare ValueHealth EconomicsGlobal HealthInternational HealthBusinessHealth Care CostNonmarket ValuationDecision Science
Although the threshold of cost effectiveness of medical interventions is thought to be 20 000- 30 000 UK pounds in the UK, and $50 000-$100 000 in the US, it is well known that these values are unjustified, due to lack of explicit scientific evidence. We measured willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional quality-adjusted life-year gained to determine the threshold of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Our study used the Internet to compare WTP for the additional year of survival in a perfect status of health in Japan, the Republic of Korea (ROK), Taiwan, Australia, the UK, and the US. The research utilized a double-bound dichotomous choice, and analysis by the nonparametric Turnbull method. WTP values were JPY 5 million (Japan), KWN 68 million (ROK), NT$ 2.1 million (Taiwan), 23 000 UK pounds (UK), AU$ 64 000 (Australia), and US$ 62 000 (US). The discount rates of outcome were estimated at 6.8% (Japan), 3.7% (ROK), 1.6% (Taiwan), 2.8% (UK), 1.9% (Australia), and 3.2% (US). Based on the current study, we suggest new classification of cost-effectiveness plane and methodology for decision making.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1