The cultural work of microwork

Lilly Irani

New Media & Society · 2013 · 533 citations · 25 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Crowdsourcing systems do more than complete information tasks, and research has highlighted concerns about worker fairness and microlabor alienation. This paper argues that microwork systems create a distinction between innovative and menial laborers, easing tensions in new media production cultures, and focuses on Amazon Mechanical Turk as a case study of its cultural work through labor divisions and software interfaces. Using Amazon Mechanical Turk as an emblematic example, the authors draw on infrastructure studies and feminist science and technology studies to examine its labor practices, methods of worker control, and the types of users it produces.

Abstract

Crowdsourcing systems do more than get information work done. This paper argues that microwork systems produce the difference between “innovative” laborers and “menial” laborers, ameliorating resulting tensions in new media production cultures in turn. This paper focuses on Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) as an emblematic case of microwork crowdsourcing. Ethical research on crowdsourcing has focused on questions of worker fairness and microlabor alienation. This paper focuses on the cultural work of AMT’s mediations: divisions of labor and software interfaces. This paper draws from infrastructure studies and feminist science and technology studies to examine Amazon Mechanical Turk labor practice, its methods of worker control, and the kinds of users it produces.

References

25