Clinical Cancer Research · 2004 · 236 citations · 33 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyGenitourinary OncologyMetastasisMolecular OncologyCancer BiomarkersCancer StagingKidney CancerMolecular Tumor ProfilingRenal Cell CarcinomaRenal NeoplasmsConcordance IndexMolecular Prognostic MarkersPrognostic ModelsPrognostic PredictionPrognostic Prediction ModelsPrognostic Staging ModelsPrognostic VariablesRenal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers
PURPOSE: An accurate system for predicting survival for patients with solid tumors will allow for better patient selection for both established and novel therapies. We propose a staging system for clear cell variants of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that includes molecular predictors and standard clinical predictors such as tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, histological grade, and performance status (PS). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A custom tissue array was constructed using clear cell RCC from 318 patients, representing all stages of localized and metastatic RCC, and immunohistochemically stained for molecular markers Ki67, p53, gelsolin, CA9, CA12, PTEN, EpCAM, and vimentin. We present a strategy for evaluating individual candidate markers for prognostic information and integrating informative markers into a multivariate prognostic system. RESULTS: The overall median follow-up and the median follow-up for surviving patients were 28 and 55 months, respectively. A prognostic model based primarily on molecular markers included metastasis status, p53, CA9, gelsolin, and vimentin as predictors and had high discriminatory power: its statistically validated concordance index (C-index) was found to be 0.75. A prognostic model based on a combination of clinical and molecular predictors included metastasis status, T stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS, p53, CA9, and vimentin as predictors and had a C-index of 0.79, which was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that of prognostic models based on grade alone (C = 0.65), TNM stage alone (C = 0.73), or the University of California Los Angeles integrated staging system (C = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Protein expressions obtained using widely available technology can complement standard clinical predictors such as TNM stage, histological grade, and PS.
33
Leo Breiman · Machine Learning · 2001 · 126.2K citations · Full text
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
Laura van ‘t Veer, Hongyue Dai, Marc J. van de Vijver et al. · Nature · 2002 · 9.6K citations · Full text
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
Marc J. van de Vijver, Yudong D. He, Laura van ‘t Veer et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 6.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Bioinformatics, Oncology +17