Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2002 · 440 citations · 27 references
DentistryBiologyEvolutionary BiologyCraniofacial DevelopmentCraniofacial GrowthHuman EvolutionCranial EvolutionCraniofacial EvolutionCraniofacial MorphogenesisOntogeny Of Craniofacial StructuresSkull Base DevelopmentArchaic Homo EvolutionCranial Base AngleCranial Base VariationCranial DevelopmentCranial Growth PatternsCranial Morphology EvolutionCranial Shape VariationCranial Variation
Despite much data, there is no unanimity over how to define Homo sapiens in the fossil record. We use a cranial growth model to analyze cranial variation among Pleistocene and recent fossils, identifying autapomorphies that distinguish anatomically modern H. sapiens from archaic Homo. The study tests hypotheses about the developmental changes underlying the origin of modern human cranial form.
Despite much data, there is no unanimity over how to define Homo sapiens in the fossil record. Here, we examine cranial variation among Pleistocene and recent human fossils by using a model of cranial growth to identify unique derived features (autapomorphies) that reliably distinguish fossils attributed to “anatomically modern” H. sapiens (AMHS) from those attributed to various taxa of “archaic” Homo spp . (AH) and to test hypotheses about the changes in cranial development that underlie the origin of modern human cranial form. In terms of pattern, AMHS crania are uniquely characterized by two general structural autapomorphies: facial retraction and neurocranial globularity. Morphometric analysis of the ontogeny of these autapomorphies indicates that the developmental changes that led to modern human cranial form derive from a combination of shifts in cranial base angle, cranial fossae length and width, and facial length. These morphological changes, some of which may have occurred because of relative size increases in the temporal and possibly the frontal lobes, occur early in ontogeny, and their effects on facial retraction and neurocranial globularity discriminate AMHS from AH crania. The existence of these autapomorphies supports the hypothesis that AMHS is a distinct species from taxa of “archaic” Homo (e.g., Homo neanderthalensis ).
27
Stephen Jay Gould · Art Journal · 1996 · 568 citations
Molecular analysis of Neanderthal DNA from the northern Caucasus
Igor V. Ovchinnikov, Anders Götherström, Galina P. Romanova et al. · Nature · 2000 · 547 citations