Hoards, votives, offerings: the archaeology of the dedicated object

TLDR

Objects given to supernatural powers have been neglected by archaeologists. The paper argues that such dedicated objects are important and should be studied, noting that their neglect stems from publishing by type and that religious practices cannot be understood solely from texts. The study examines why these objects are neglected, including publication practices and the assumption that texts are required, and outlines the concerns addressed in the subsequent papers. Keywords: Ritual, votive, dedication, gift, deposit.

Abstract

Abstract Objects given to supernatural powers have been remarkably neglected by archaeologists. This paper makes the case for the importance of such objects, whether they be described as votives, dedications, ritual deposits, ritual hoards, offerings or by some other term. It explores some archaeological reasons for their neglect, including the practice of publishing artefacts by type rather than by context, and argues that archaeologists should not assume that religious practices can be discussed only when there are texts available as guides. It summarizes the particular concerns of the papers which follow in this volume. Keywords: Ritualvotivededicationgiftdeposit