The Ethics of Management Research: An Exploratory Content Analysis

Emma Bell, Alan Bryman

British Journal of Management · 2006 · 507 citations · 52 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Management scholars have traditionally used ethics codes from other social science fields to guide their research practice. This study questions whether that practice remains viable amid rising ethical regulation and argues that management research faces distinct ethical challenges that require explicit contextual consideration. The authors conduct an exploratory content analysis of ethics codes from nine social scientific associations to identify core principles and assess their ethical tone. They find reciprocity is rarely addressed, suggesting ethics codes could reshape management research relationships, and while such codes risk promoting minimal compliance, they also offer an aspirational agenda, making their development a worthwhile endeavor.

Abstract

Management academics have tended to rely on ethics codes developed by social researchers in related fields to inform their research practice. The point of this paper is to question whether this remains a viable approach in the current climate that is characterized by a significant increase in ethical regulation across the social sciences. We suggest that management researchers face ethical issues of a different nature to those most frequently confronted by other social science researchers, and argue for more explicit acknowledgement of contextual factors involved in management research. An exploratory analysis of the content of ethics codes formulated by nine social scientific associations is undertaken to identify the main ethical principles they cover and to analyse their underlying ethical tone. Drawing attention to the principle of reciprocity, which is found in very few codes, we suggest that an ethics code could be used to formulate new ways of thinking about management research relationships. Despite the risk that ethics codes may encourage instrumental compliance with minimal ethical obligations, we suggest they also have the potential to reflect a more aspirational agenda. The development of an ethics code for management research should therefore be seen as a potentially worthwhile project.

References

52