Publication | Closed Access
The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care.
1.1K
Citations
0
References
1990
Year
Traumatic Brain InjuryTraumatologyTrauma (Addiction Psychology)Trauma SystemSerious Head InjuryBrain InjuryTrauma (Critical Care Medicine)Health SciencesTrauma Center CareEmergency Medicine TraumaOutcomes ResearchTrauma SurgeryRehabilitationNational NormsTrauma TreatmentTrauma CarePatient SafetyTrauma ScoreTrauma TriageConcussionMedicineEmergency MedicineTrauma PatientsPost-traumatic Stress Disorder
MTOS is a retrospective descriptive study coordinated by the ACS Committee on Trauma that compiles injury severity and outcomes. Data from 1982‑1987 were collected from 139 North American hospitals on 80,544 patients, and survival probability norms were generated using RTS, ISS, age, and mechanism, with institutions compared on expected versus observed survivors. Motor‑vehicle injuries were most common (34.7%), 21 % had penetrating wounds, overall mortality was 9 %, and mortality for direct admissions rose from 5 % to 40 % with increasing head‑injury severity, providing a baseline for quality assurance.
The Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) is a retrospective descriptive study of injury severity and outcome coordinated through the American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma. From 1982 through 1987, 139 North American hospitals submitted demographic, etiologic, injury severity, and outcome data for 80,544 trauma patients. Motor vehicle related injuries were most frequent (34.7%). Twenty-one per cent of patients had penetrating injuries. The overall mortality rate was 9.0%. The mortality rate for direct admissions was strongly related to the presence of serious head injury, 5.0% and 40.0%, when head injuries were less than or equal to AIS (Abbreviated Injury Scale) 3 or greater than or equal to AIS 4, respectively. Survival probability norms use the Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, patient age, and injury mechanism. Patients with unexpected outcomes were identified and statistical comparisons of actual and expected numbers of survivors made for each institution. Results provide a description of injury and outcome and support evaluation and quality assurance activities.