African Journal of Agricultural Research · 2009 · 120 citations · 12 references
AgricultureAgricultural EconomicsMarketingAgricultural DevelopmentAgricultural MarketingRural DevelopmentAgricultural Household EconomicsAgricultural Market ChannelsAgricultural Marketing PolicyFarm MarketingSmallholder Farming SystemsFarmer Marketing BehaviorMarket Access For SmallholdersMarket Participation By SmallholdersMultinomial RegressionSmallholder FarmersSmallholder LivelihoodsSmallholder Market ParticipationTechnology Adoption By Smallholders
Smallholder farmers in the Kat River Valley underutilize output markets because of multiple factors, and an explicit analysis of technology, institutions, and markets could aid livelihood‑improving programs. The paper aims to identify technical and institutional factors that deter smallholders from marketing and to propose ways to enhance market participation for livelihood development. A multinomial regression model was applied to assess how various factors influence marketing choices among smallholder and emerging farmers in the Kat River Valley. Empirical results indicate that market information, grading expertise, contractual agreements, social capital, market infrastructure, group participation, and tradition significantly shape household marketing behavior.
Smallholder farmers in the Kat River Valley do not use output markets effectively due to a number of factors. The technical and institutional factors that demoralise them from marketing are identified in this paper. It is asserted that an explicit analysis in the relationship between technology, institutions and markets may be useful in developing livelihood improving programs. Therefore, by identifying such factors, the paper seeks to find out ways of improving market participation among the smallholders, hence, livelihood development. The multinomial regression model was used to investigate the factors that influence marketing choices among smallholder and emerging farmers in the area under study. Empirical results show that market information, expertise on grades and standards, contractual agreements, social capital, market infrastructure, group participation and tradition significantly influence household marketing behaviour.
12