Circulation · 2013 · 198 citations · 18 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryInterventional CardiologyVascular SurgeryCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary Artery SurgeryPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary Flow AssessmentFractional Flow Reserve ImagingGuided Coronary InterventionMultivessel Coronary Artery DiseaseOverall MortalityPercutaneous Coronary Intervention Care
BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is well established for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, yet little is known about candidates for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: From 2006 to 2010, we retrospectively included in this registry 627 consecutive patients treated by coronary artery bypass graft surgery having at least 1 angiographically intermediate stenosis. In 429 patients, coronary artery bypass graft surgery was based solely on angiography (angiography-guided group). In 198 patients, at least 1 intermediate stenosis was grafted with an FFR ≤0.80 or deferred with an FFR >0.80 (FFR-guided group). The end point was major adverse cardiovascular events at 3 years, defined as the composite of overall death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. The rate of angiographic multivessel disease was similar in the angiography-guided and FFR-guided groups (404 [94.2%] versus 186 [93.9%]; P=0.722). In the FFR-guided group, this was significantly downgraded after FFR measurements to 86.4% (P<0.001 versus before FFR) and was associated with a smaller number of anastomoses (3 [2-3] versus 3 [2-4]; P<0.001) and rate of on-pump surgery (49% versus 69%; P<0.001). At 3 years, major adverse cardiovascular events were not different between the angiography-guided and FFR-guided groups (12% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 1.030; 95% confidence interval, 0.627-1.692; P=0.908). However, the FFR-guided group compared with the angiography-guided group presented a significantly lower rate of angina (Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II-IV, 31% versus 47%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FFR-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery was associated with a lower number of graft anastomoses and a lower rate of on-pump surgery compared with angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. This did not result in a higher event rate during up to 36 months of follow-up and was associated with a lower rate of angina.
18
William Wijns, N Danchin, Carlo Di Mario et al. · European Heart Journal · 2010 · 3.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +16
Rory Hachamovitch, Sean W. Hayes, John D. Friedman et al. · Circulation · 2003 · 1.6K citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +13