New England Journal of Medicine · 2012 · 702 citations · 37 references
MedicineCardiologyEmergency MedicineCardiothoracic RadiologyClinical CardiologyDiagnostic ImagingAcute Coronary Syndrome CareAcute Coronary SyndromesCardiovascular ImagingComputed TomographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseAcute Coronary Syndrome DetectionAcute Coronary Syndrome ManagementCardiac Computed TomographyComputed Tomography Coronary AngiographyCoronary Artery Disease DetectionCoronary Ct AngiographyPositive Predictive ValueSafe Discharge Planning
BACKGROUND: Admission rates among patients presenting to emergency departments with possible acute coronary syndromes are high, although for most of these patients, the symptoms are ultimately found not to have a cardiac cause. Coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) has a very high negative predictive value for the detection of coronary disease, but its usefulness in determining whether discharge of patients from the emergency department is safe is not well established. METHODS: We randomly assigned low-to-intermediate-risk patients presenting with possible acute coronary syndromes, in a 2:1 ratio, to undergo CCTA or to receive traditional care. Patients were enrolled at five centers in the United States. Patients older than 30 years of age with a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction risk score of 0 to 2 and signs or symptoms warranting admission or testing were eligible. The primary outcome was safety, assessed in the subgroup of patients with a negative CCTA examination, with safety defined as the absence of myocardial infarction and cardiac death during the first 30 days after presentation. RESULTS: We enrolled 1370 subjects: 908 in the CCTA group and 462 in the group receiving traditional care. The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. Of 640 patients with a negative CCTA examination, none died or had a myocardial infarction within 30 days (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to 0.57). As compared with patients receiving traditional care, patients in the CCTA group had a higher rate of discharge from the emergency department (49.6% vs. 22.7%; difference, 26.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 21.4 to 32.2), a shorter length of stay (median, 18.0 hours vs. 24.8 hours; P<0.001), and a higher rate of detection of coronary disease (9.0% vs. 3.5%; difference, 5.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 0 to 11.2). There was one serious adverse event in each group. CONCLUSIONS: A CCTA-based strategy for low-to-intermediate-risk patients presenting with a possible acute coronary syndrome appears to allow the safe, expedited discharge from the emergency department of many patients who would otherwise be admitted. (Funded by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Health and the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00933400.).
37
Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction
Kristian Thygesen, Joseph S. Alpert, Harvey D. White · Circulation · 2007 · 4.2K citations
K. Thygesen, Joseph S. Alpert, Harvey D. White et al. · European Heart Journal · 2007 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Missed Diagnoses of Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Department
Jennifer Pope, Tom P. Aufderheide, Robin Ruthazer et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2000 · 1.8K citations · Full text