Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2004 · 13 citations · 22 references
MedicineInfectious DiseasesDiagnostic MicrobiologyMolecular DiagnosticsVirologyHiv DiagnosisHiv TestingInfectious Disease Molecular TestingNucleic Acid ExtractionRna-based DiagnosticsViral DiagnosticsAutomated Nucleic Acid ExtractionAutomated Sample PreparationClinical Laboratory AutomationHiv Nucleic Acid TestingHuman Immunodeficiency Virus TestingMolecular Detection AssaysQuantitative Pcr DetectionRna Extraction
Efforts have been made to achieve full automation of molecular assays for quantitative detection of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). In the present study, the Abbott LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay was evaluated in conjunction with automated HIV-1 RNA extraction on the MagNA Pure LC instrument and compared to the conventional LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay, which uses a manual nucleic acid extraction protocol. Accuracy, linearity, and interassay and intra-assay variations were determined. The performance of the assay in a routine clinical laboratory was tested with a total of 105 clinical specimens. When the accuracy of the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay with the automated sample preparation protocol was tested, all results were found to be within +/- 0.5 log unit of the expected results. Determination of linearity resulted in a quasilinear curve over 3.5 log units. For determination of interassay variation, coefficients of variation were found to be between 21 and 66% for the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay with the automated sample preparation protocol and between 10 and 69% for the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay with manual sample preparation. For determination of intra-assay variation, coefficients of variation were found to be between 7 and 25% for the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay with the automated sample preparation protocol and between 7 and 19% for the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay with manual sample preparation. When clinical samples were tested by the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay with the automated sample preparation protocol and the results were compared with those of the LCx HIV RNA Quantitative assay with manual sample preparation, 95% of all positive results were found to be within +/- 0.5 log unit. In conclusion, the assay with automated sample preparation proved to be suitable for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory and required significantly less hands-on time.
22
Janet Raboud, Brian Conway, Sandra Rae et al. · AIDS · 1998 · 260 citations
Predictors of optimal virological response to potent antiretroviral therapy
William G. Powderly, Michael S. Saag, Sharon Chapman et al. · AIDS · 1999 · 180 citations
Andrea Grisold, Eva Leitner, Gerhard Mühlbauer et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2002 · 101 citations · Full text
Fully Automated Nucleic Acid Extraction: MagNA Pure LC
Harald H. Kessler, Gerhard Mühlbauer, Evelyn Stelzl et al. · Clinical Chemistry · 2001 · 100 citations