In-between practice: working in the ‘thirdspace’ of sensory and multimodal methodology

Rachel Hurdley, Bella Dicks

Qualitative Research · 2011 · 76 citations · 26 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Sensory ethnography and multimodality both seek to capture the multidimensional social world, with the former centering the embodied, affective experience of participants and researchers and the latter focusing on the gaps between modes, materials, and representations. The article aims to show how combining sensory and multimodal methods creates a new reflexive space that balances embodied closeness with modal distance, enabling innovative social enquiry. The authors juxtapose an ethnography of corridors with a mixed‑methods study of multimodal authoring and reading practices to illustrate the encounter between sensory and multimodal approaches.

Abstract

This article discusses how emergent sensory and multimodal methodologies can work in interaction to produce innovative social enquiry. A juxtaposition of two research projects — an ethnography of corridors and a mixed methods study of multimodal authoring and ‘reading’ practices — opened up this encounter. Sensory ethnography within social research methods aims to create empathetic, experiential ways of knowing participants’ and researchers’ worlds. The linguistic field of multimodality offers a rather different framework for research attending to the visual, material and acoustic textures of participants’ interactions. While both these approaches address the multidimensional character of social worlds, the ‘sensory turn’ centres the sensuous, bodied person — participant, researcher and audience/reader — as the ‘place’ for intimate, affective forms of knowing. In contrast, multimodal knowledge production is premised on multiple analytic gaps — between modes and media, participants and materials, recording and representation. Eliciting the tensions between sensorial closeness and modal distances offers a new space for reflexive research practice and multiple ways of knowing social worlds.

References

26