Bioinformatics · 2004 · 847 citations · 48 references
ComputingBioinformaticsOncologyGene Expression AnalysisMachine LearningMolecular DiagnosticsClassificationComputational OncologyEnsemble LearningEnsemble MethodsSupport Vector MachinesTumor ClassificationClinical Cancer DiagnosisCross-validationDiagnostic Model ValidationK-fold Cross-validationMicroarray AnalysisMicroarray DiagnosticsMulticlass Support Vector MachinesMultiple Classifier Systems
MOTIVATION: Cancer diagnosis is one of the most important emerging clinical applications of gene expression microarray technology. We are seeking to develop a computer system for powerful and reliable cancer diagnostic model creation based on microarray data. To keep a realistic perspective on clinical applications we focus on multicategory diagnosis. To equip the system with the optimum combination of classifier, gene selection and cross-validation methods, we performed a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of several major algorithms for multicategory classification, several gene selection methods, multiple ensemble classifier methods and two cross-validation designs using 11 datasets spanning 74 diagnostic categories and 41 cancer types and 12 normal tissue types. RESULTS: Multicategory support vector machines (MC-SVMs) are the most effective classifiers in performing accurate cancer diagnosis from gene expression data. The MC-SVM techniques by Crammer and Singer, Weston and Watkins and one-versus-rest were found to be the best methods in this domain. MC-SVMs outperform other popular machine learning algorithms, such as k-nearest neighbors, backpropagation and probabilistic neural networks, often to a remarkable degree. Gene selection techniques can significantly improve the classification performance of both MC-SVMs and other non-SVM learning algorithms. Ensemble classifiers do not generally improve performance of the best non-ensemble models. These results guided the construction of a software system GEMS (Gene Expression Model Selector) that automates high-quality model construction and enforces sound optimization and performance estimation procedures. This is the first such system to be informed by a rigorous comparative analysis of the available algorithms and datasets. AVAILABILITY: The software system GEMS is available for download from http://www.gems-system.org for non-commercial use. CONTACT: alexander.statnikov@vanderbilt.edu.
48
Chih-Chung Chang, Chih‐Jen Lin · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · 2011 · 41.3K citations
Yuhai Wu, Vladimir Vapnik · Technometrics · 1999 · 27K citations
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Krzysztof J. Cios, Mark E. Shields · Neurocomputing · 1997 · 22.3K citations
Todd R. Golub, Donna K. Slonim, Pablo Tamayo et al. · Science · 1999 · 11.6K citations
A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection
Ron Kohavi · 1995 · 10.7K citations · Full text