Psychological Science · 2007 · 46 citations · 32 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesPsychologyExperimental PsychologySocial PerceptionVisual PerceptionEmotion PerceptionEmotion RecognitionEmotional ExpressionFace PerceptionFacial ExpressionFacial PerceptionDynamic Emotion PerceptionDynamic Facial ExpressionsEmotion Perception In FacesFacial Emotion PerceptionHaptic InputInformation TransmissionStatic Face PerceptionUniversal Facial Expressions
If humans can detect the wealth of tactile and haptic information potentially available in live facial expressions of emotion (FEEs), they should be capable of haptically recognizing the six universal expressions of emotion (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, and surprise) at levels well above chance. We tested this hypothesis in the experiments reported here. With minimal training, subjects' overall mean accuracy was 51% for static FEEs (Experiment 1) and 74% for dynamic FEEs (Experiment 2). All FEEs except static fear were successfully recognized above the chance level of 16.7%. Complementing these findings, overall confidence and information transmission were higher for dynamic than for corresponding static faces. Our performance measures (accuracy and confidence ratings, plus response latency in Experiment 2 only) confirmed that happiness, sadness, and surprise were all highly recognizable, and anger, disgust, and fear less so.
32
Basic objects in natural categories
Eleanor Rosch, Carolyn Β. Mervis, Wayne D. Gray et al. · Cognitive Psychology · 1976 · 5.5K citations
Deciphering the Enigmatic Face
Zara Ambadar, Jonathan W. Schooler, Jeffrey F. Cohn · Psychological Science · 2005 · 648 citations
Categorical perception of facial expressions
Nancy L. Etcoff, John Magee · Cognition · 1992 · 594 citations