Journal of Development Effectiveness · 2009 · 419 citations · 18 references
Public AffairsPublic PolicyCausal InferenceImpact MeasurementPolicy EvaluationCounterfactual AnalysisEvaluation DesignImpact EvaluationMixed-methods EvaluationOutcome EvaluationTheory-based EvaluationCausal Impact AnalysisEvaluationHeterogeneityImpact AssessmentImpact Evaluation FrameworksMixed Methods AnalysisMixed-methods Impact EvaluationProgram Impact Evaluation
Calls for rigorous impact evaluation have been accompanied by the quest not just to find out what works but why. It is widely accepted that a theory-based approach to impact evaluation, one that maps out the causal chain from inputs to outcomes and impact and tests the underlying assumptions, will shed light on the why question. But application of a theory-based approach remains weak. This paper identifies the following six principles to successful application of the approach: (1) map out the causal chain (programme theory); (2) understand context; (3) anticipate heterogeneity; (4) rigorous evaluation of impact using a credible counterfactual; (5) rigorous factual analysis; and (6) use mixed methods.
18
American Economic Review · 2013 · 15.2K citations
Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics
Edward E. Leamer · American Economic Review · 1982 · 2.3K citations
Journal of Development Economics · 1997 · 844 citations
James Copestake · Development in Practice · 1995 · 404 citations
Social Sciences, Economics, Finance +10
Arguing with the crocodile: gender and class in Bangladesh
Choice Reviews Online · 1993 · 214 citations