Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · 2013 · 24 citations · 14 references
Natural SciencesEarth SciencesMeteorologyAtmospheric ScienceNumerical Weather PredictionWeather ForecastingAtmospheric Sounding From SatellitesSatellite Image InterpretationSatellite SensorsAtmospheric Motion EquationsAtmospheric Motion Vector AnalysisAtmospheric Motion Vector DerivationAtmospheric Motion VectorsGeostationary Satellite MonitoringHeight EstimationRandom ErrorsWind Field Retrieval
Abstract The objective of this study is to improve the characterization of satellite-derived atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) and their errors to guide developments in the use of AMVs in numerical weather prediction. AMVs tend to exhibit considerable systematic and random errors that arise in the derivation or the interpretation of AMVs as single-level point observations of wind. One difficulty in the study of AMV errors is the scarcity of collocated observations of clouds and wind. This study uses instead a simulation framework: geostationary imagery for Meteosat-8 is generated from a high-resolution simulation with the Weather Research and Forecasting regional model, and AMVs are derived from sequences of these images. The forecast model provides the “truth” with a sophisticated description of the atmosphere. The study considers infrared and water vapor AMVs from cloudy scenes. This is the first part of a two-part paper, and it introduces the framework and provides a first evaluation in terms of the brightness temperatures of the simulated images and the derived AMVs. The simulated AMVs show a considerable global bias in the height assignment (60–75 hPa) that is not observed in real AMVs. After removal of this bias, however, the statistics comparing the simulated AMVs with the true model wind show characteristics that are similar to statistics comparing real AMVs with short-range forecasts (speed bias and root-mean-square vector difference typically agree to within 1 m s −1 ). This result suggests that the error in the simulated AMVs is comparable to or larger than that in real AMVs. There is evidence for significant spatial, temporal, and vertical error correlations, with the scales for the spatial error correlations being consistent with estimates for real data.
14
Gregory Thompson, Paul R. Field, Roy Rasmussen et al. · Monthly Weather Review · 2008 · 3.2K citations · Full text
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2
William C. Skamarock, Joseph B. Klemp, Jimy Dudhia et al. · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 2005 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Operational Cloud-Motion Winds from Meteosat Infrared Images
Johannes Schmetz, Kenneth Holmlund, J. Hoffman et al. · Journal of Applied Meteorology · 1993 · 302 citations · Full text