Struggling over the mode of incorporation: backlash against multiculturalism in Europe

Jeffrey C. Alexander

Ethnic and Racial Studies · 2013 · 122 citations · 63 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The growing presence of Islamic immigrants in Europe has sparked a backlash that frames Islam as a threat to democracy, prompting calls for assimilation, restrictive citizenship tests, and the rise of xenophobic parties, with the debate focusing on how to incorporate immigrants rather than whether to. The essay aims to document the potency and reach of this backlash and to offer a new theoretical model explaining it. It adopts a cultural‑sociological approach that foregrounds meanings and emotions over demographic and institutional facts to explain the backlash. The model accounts for the backlash’s dynamics and provides a framework for understanding how multiculturalism is contested in Europe.

Abstract

Abstract Documenting the extraordinary potency and reach of the European backlash against multiculturalism, this essay provides a new theoretical model for explaining it. Rather than focusing primarily on demographic and institutional facts about Islamic immigration – such as education, wealth, participation and mobility – the author proposes a cultural-sociological approach that focuses on meanings and emotions as core issues for civil societies. As the demographic presence of Islamic immigrants has intensified, the anti-civil construction of Islamic qualities has led European masses, leaders and intellectuals, not only from the right but from the centre and left, to demand homogenizing assimilation. Representing public practices of Islam as threatening European democracy, newly restrictive citizenship tests have emerged alongside growing xenophobic political parties and newly threatening neo-fascist violence. Initially brought to Europe for economic and political reasons, the question has now become whether the children and grandchildren of Islamic immigrants can be incorporated into European civil society. The conflict is not over whether immigrants should be incorporated but over the grounds for doing so.

References

63