Publication | Closed Access
What is associated with race performance in male 100-km ultra-marathoners – anthropometry, training or marathon best time?
64
Citations
42
References
2011
Year
Physical ActivityFitnessRace PerformanceEducationAnthropometric IndicatorBest TimeRecreational Male Ultra-marathonersKinesiologyBody CompositionExerciseHuman Performance MeasuringApplied PhysiologyClinical ExerciseSport PhysiologySport ScienceHealth SciencesPhysical FitnessClinical Exercise PhysiologyExercise ScienceExercise PhysiologyPhysiologyBivariate AnalysisAthletic TrainingRace Time
We investigated the associations of anthropometry, training, and pre-race experience with race time in 93 recreational male ultra-marathoners (mean age 44.6 years, s = 10.0; body mass 74.0 kg, s = 9.0; height 1.77 m, s = 0.06; body mass index 23.4 kg · m(-2), s = 2.0) in a 100-km ultra-marathon using bivariate and multivariate analysis. In the bivariate analysis, body mass index (r = 0.24), the sum of eight skinfolds (r = 0.55), percent body fat (r = 0.57), weekly running hours (r = -0.29), weekly running kilometres (r = -0.49), running speed during training (r = -0.50), and personal best time in a marathon (r = 0.72) were associated with race time. Results of the multiple regression analysis revealed an independent and negative association of weekly running kilometres and average speed in training with race time, as well as a significant positive association between the sum of eight skinfold thicknesses and race time. There was a significant positive association between 100-km race time and personal best time in a marathon. We conclude that both training and anthropometry were independently associated with race performance. These characteristics remained relevant even when controlling for personal best time in a marathon.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1