Publication | Closed Access
Privacy and the Computer: Why We Need Privacy in the Information Society
147
Citations
12
References
1997
Year
EngineeringInformation SecurityLawAdministrative LawInformation PrivacyCommunicationTechnology LawNetwork PrivacyDisclosurePrivacy FrameworkPrivacy ComplianceUseless ConceptPrivacy ManagementInformation SocietyPrivacy By DesignPrivacy IssueData PrivacyTrustPrivacy AnonymityPrivacy ConcernPrivacyData SecurityCryptographyPrivacy PreservationSignificant Philosophical DebateSocial ComputingData Privacy Law
For more than thirty years, philosophers have debated privacy, yet many assume it is an intuitive value that can be sacrificed for national security, justice, and state administration. The paper argues that privacy is a fundamental notion deserving extraordinary protection and support, and that transparency and accountability are only meaningful within a privacy context. Drawing on philosophical and legal literature, the author discusses privacy as the essential foundation of human autonomy in social relationships. The paper concludes that recognizing privacy as fundamental has broad implications for the information society and for the discipline of information systems.
For more than thirty years an extensive and significant philosophical debate about the notion of privacy has been going on. Therefore it seems puzzling that most current authors on information technology and privacy assume that all individuals intuitively know why privacy is important. This assumption allows privacy to be seen as a liberal “nice to have” value: something that can easily be discarded in the face of other really important matters like national security, the doing of justice and the effective administration of the state and the corporation. In this paper I want to argue that there is something fundamental in the notion of privacy and that due to the profoundness of the notion it merits extraordinary measures of protection and overt support. I will also argue that the notion of transparency (as advocated by Wasserstrom) is a useless concept without privacy and that accountability and transparency can only be meaningful if encapsulated in the context of privacy. From philosophical and legal literature I will discuss and argue the value of privacy as the essential context and foundation of human autonomy in social relationships. In the conclusion of the paper I will discuss implications of this notion of privacy for the information society in general, and for the discipline of information systems in particular.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1