Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing · 2012 · 30 citations · 19 references
MedicineCritical Care NursingCritical Care MedicinePain ManagementPain MedicinePain AssessmentPain MeasurementInterrater ReliabilityKappa CoefficientKappa StatisticNonverbal Pain AssessmentPain Assessment ReliabilityPain Assessment TranslationPsychometric PropertiesPsychometric Validity
PURPOSE: The purpose of this methodological study was to examine the reliability and validity of a translated Korean version of the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) developed for assessment of pain in critically ill nonverbal patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 202 critically ill patients admitted to a university hospital. Upon establishment of content and translation equivalence between the English and Korean version of CPOT, psychometric properties were evaluated. RESULTS: The interrater reliability was found to be acceptable with the weighted kappa coefficients of .81-.88. Significant high correlations between the CPOT and the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Indicators were found indicating good concurrent validity (r=.72-.83, p<.001). Data showed the area under the ROC curve of 0.86 with a cut-off point of 1, which resulted in 76.9% sensitivity and 88.6% specificity. The mean score of CPOT during suctioning was significantly different from that of before (t=-14.16, p<.001) or 20 minutes after suctioning (t=16.31, p<.001). CONCLUSION: Results of this study suggest that the CPOT can be used as a reliable and valid measure to assess pain in critically ill nonverbal patients.
19
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Graham M. Teasdale, Bryan Jennett · The Lancet · 1974 · 13.1K citations
D Bieri, Robert A. Reeve, David G. Champion et al. · Pain · 1990 · 1.1K citations