Clinical Cancer Research · 2009 · 207 citations · 48 references
MedicineMolecular GeneticsOncologyCancer GeneticsMolecular OncologyNeoplasiaCancer GenomicsOral CarcinogenesisOropharyngeal CancerSquamous Cell CarcinomaOropharyngeal LesionsP16 ExpressionTumor Stage Prognosis
PURPOSE: Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-containing oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) have a better prognosis than patients with HPV-negative OSCC. This may be attributed to different genetic pathways promoting cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We used comparative genomic hybridization to identify critical genetic changes in 60 selected OSCC, 28 of which were associated with HPV-16 as determined by HPV-specific PCR and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis and positive p16(INK4A) immunostaining. The results were correlated with HPV status and clinical data from patients. RESULTS: Two thirds of OSCC harbored gain at 3q26.3-qter irrespective of HPV status. In HPV-negative tumors this alteration was associated with advanced tumor stage (P=0.013). In comparison with HPV-related OSCC, the HPV-negative tumors harbored: (a) a higher number of chromosomal alterations and amplifications (P=0.03 and 0.039, respectively); (b) significantly more losses at 3p, 5q, 9p, 15q, and 18q, and gains/amplifications at 11q13 (P=0.002, 0.03; <0.001, 0.02, 0.004, and 0.001, respectively); and (c) less often 16q losses and Xp gains (P=0.02 and 0.03). Survival analysis revealed a significantly better disease-free survival for HPV-related OSCC (P=0.02), whereas chromosome amplification was an unfavorable prognostic indicator for disease-free and overall survival (P=0.01 and 0.05, respectively). Interestingly, 16q loss, predominantly identified in HPV-related OSCC, was a strong indicator of favorable outcome (overall survival, P=0.008; disease-free survival, P=0.01) and none of these patients had a tumor recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic signatures of HPV-related and HPV-unrelated OSCC are different and most likely underlie differences in tumor development and progression. In addition, distinct chromosomal alterations have prognostic significance.
48
Ahmedin Jemal, Rebecca L. Siegel, Elizabeth Ward et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2008 · 10.2K citations · Full text
Carole Fakhry, William H. Westra, S. Li et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2008 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Case–Control Study of Human Papillomavirus and Oropharyngeal Cancer
Gypsyamber DʼSouza, Aimée R. Kreimer, Raphael P. Viscidi et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2007 · 2.7K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Cancer Control +13
Genetic progression model for head and neck cancer: implications for field cancerization.
Joseph A. Califano, Peter van der Riet, William H. Westra et al. · PubMed · 1996 · 1.4K citations
André Lopes Carvalho, Inês Nobuko Nishimoto, Joseph A. Califano et al. · International Journal of Cancer · 2004 · 861 citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Otolaryngology +11