Asymmetric quantum codes: constructions, bounds and performance

Pradeep Kiran Sarvepalli, Andreas Klappenecker, Martin Rötteler

Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · 2009 · 153 citations · 32 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Quantum error‑correcting codes exploit asymmetry between bit‑ and phase‑flip error probabilities, as seen in channels like combined amplitude damping and dephasing where these probabilities relate to relaxation and dephasing times. The study investigates asymmetric quantum codes derived via the Calderbank–Shor–Steane (CSS) construction. The authors use CSS construction with BCH and finite‑geometry LDPC codes, deriving upper bounds on parameters by linear programming and constructing new families of asymmetric stabilizer codes from nested classical codes. The resulting codes achieve higher rates without loss of performance compared to symmetric codes, and also deliver superior performance at comparable rates, demonstrating the benefits of the proposed asymmetric construction.

Abstract

Recently, quantum error-correcting codes have been proposed that capitalize on the fact that many physical error models lead to a significant asymmetry between the probabilities for bit- and phase-flip errors. An example for a channel that exhibits such asymmetry is the combined amplitude damping and dephasing channel, where the probabilities of bit and phase flips can be related to relaxation and dephasing time, respectively. We study asymmetric quantum codes that are obtained from the Calderbank–Shor–Steane (CSS) construction. For such codes, we derive upper bounds on the code parameters using linear programming. A central result of this paper is the explicit construction of some new families of asymmetric quantum stabilizer codes from pairs of nested classical codes. For instance, we derive asymmetric codes using a combination of Bose–Chaudhuri–Hocquenghem (BCH) and finite geometry low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes. We show that the asymmetric quantum codes offer two advantages, namely to allow a higher rate without sacrificing performance when compared with symmetric codes and vice versa to allow a higher performance when compared with symmetric codes of comparable rates. Our approach is based on a CSS construction that combines BCH and finite geometry LDPC codes.

References

32