JAMA · 1995 · 29 citations · 10 references
PharmacyCardiologyPharmacoeconomicsClinical PharmacologyCost-effectiveness AnalysisPharmacoeconomic ModelingAnticoagulant ManagementAnticoagulant TherapyAnticoagulation ManagementAnticoagulation TherapyAntithrombotic TherapyCost-effectiveness ModelingHospital Stay DurationMyocardial Infarction PharmacotherapyPlacebo-controlled Efficacy AssessmentProphylactic Anticoagulation
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the costs and effects of long-term oral anticoagulant treatment after myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis, based on a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Sixty Dutch hospitals. PATIENTS: A total of 3404 hospital survivors of acute myocardial infarction randomized within a median period of 4 days after discharge to either oral anticoagulant treatment or placebo. The mean follow-up was 37 months. INTERVENTION: Oral anticoagulant treatment aimed at a target international normalized ratio of 2.8 to 4.8. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Costs of hospital stay during readmissions, costs related to major cardiologic interventions, and costs of oral anticoagulant treatment. RESULTS: The costs of oral anticoagulant treatment were estimated at 394 Dutch guilders (Dfl) per patient-year (Dfl 1 = US $0.58). Placebo patients stayed 18,830 days in the hospital compared with 15,083 days for anticoagulation patients. Average costs per patient of medical care during follow-up were estimated at Dfl 10,784 for placebo patients and Dfl 9878 for anticoagulation patients. CONCLUSIONS: Costs of long-term anticoagulant treatment are outweighed by the costs of prevented clinical events.
10
Robert Altman, L Carreras, Rubén Sierra Díaz et al. · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 1994 · 3.3K citations
Maarten L. Simoons, Jeroen Vos, Jan G.P. Tijssen et al. · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 1989 · 220 citations