Linguistic tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, <i>ASPM</i> and <i>Microcephalin</i>

Dan Dediu, D. Robert Ladd

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2007 · 258 citations · 53 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Genetic and linguistic diversities are often correlated due to shared historical and geographic influences, though some studies suggest a potential causal link where alleles may affect language evolution. The study investigates whether the frequencies of ASPM and Microcephalin alleles are associated with the use of linguistic tone. Using a database of 983 allele frequencies and 26 linguistic features across 49 populations, the authors test the allele‑tone association while controlling for geographic and historical factors.

Abstract

The correlations between interpopulation genetic and linguistic diversities are mostly noncausal (spurious), being due to historical processes and geographical factors that shape them in similar ways. Studies of such correlations usually consider allele frequencies and linguistic groupings (dialects, languages, linguistic families or phyla), sometimes controlling for geographic, topographic, or ecological factors. Here, we consider the relation between allele frequencies and linguistic typological features. Specifically, we focus on the derived haplogroups of the brain growth and development-related genes ASPM and Microcephalin, which show signs of natural selection and a marked geographic structure, and on linguistic tone, the use of voice pitch to convey lexical or grammatical distinctions. We hypothesize that there is a relationship between the population frequency of these two alleles and the presence of linguistic tone and test this hypothesis relative to a large database (983 alleles and 26 linguistic features in 49 populations), showing that it is not due to the usual explanatory factors represented by geography and history. The relationship between genetic and linguistic diversity in this case may be causal: certain alleles can bias language acquisition or processing and thereby influence the trajectory of language change through iterated cultural transmission.

References

53