Publication | Open Access
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
7.4K
Citations
51
References
2004
Year
Behavioral Decision MakingField ExperimentIndirect EffectTreatment EffectSocial InfluenceConfidence LimitsQuasi-experimentCausal InferenceSocial SciencesPsychologyBiasResampling MethodsStatisticsSelection BiasZ StatisticExperimental PsychologyTime-varying ConfoundingInteraction EffectPersuasion
The most commonly used method to test an indirect effect is to divide the estimate by its standard error and compare the resulting z statistic with a critical value from the standard normal distribution, and confidence limits for the indirect effect are also typically based on critical values from the standard normal distribution. This article uses a simulation study to demonstrate that confidence limits are imbalanced because the distribution of the indirect effect is normal only in special cases. Two alternatives for improving the performance of confidence limits for the indirect effect are evaluated: a method based on the distribution of the product of two normal random variables, and resampling methods. In Study 1, confidence limits based on the distribution of the product are more accurate than methods based on an assumed normal distribution but remain imbalanced, while Study 2 shows that resampling methods, particularly the bias‑corrected bootstrap, yield more accurate confidence limits overall.
The most commonly used method to test an indirect effect is to divide the estimate of the indirect effect by its standard error and compare the resulting z statistic with a critical value from the standard normal distribution. Confidence limits for the indirect effect are also typically based on critical values from the standard normal distribution. This article uses a simulation study to demonstrate that confidence limits are imbalanced because the distribution of the indirect effect is normal only in special cases. Two alternatives for improving the performance of confidence limits for the indirect effect are evaluated: (a) a method based on the distribution of the product of two normal random variables, and (b) resampling methods. In Study 1, confidence limits based on the distribution of the product are more accurate than methods based on an assumed normal distribution but confidence limits are still imbalanced. Study 2 demonstrates that more accurate confidence limits are obtained using resampling methods, with the bias-corrected bootstrap the best method overall.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1