Contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. spio-enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation - Concepedia

Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Contrast-enhanced FDG-PET/CT vs. spio-enhanced MRI vs. FDG-PET vs. CT in patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a prospective study with intraoperative confirmation

128

Citations

34

References

2007

Year

Eli D Rappeport, Annika Loft, Anne Kiil Berthelsen, Peter von der Recke, P. Larsen, Anne Mellon Mogensen, A. Wettergren, Allan Rasmussen, Preben Olund Kirkegaard, Carsten Thomsen

Acta Radiologica

Abstract

CT and SPIO-enhanced MR imaging are more sensitive but less specific than PET in the detection of LM. PET/CT can detect more patients with extrahepatic tumor than CT alone.

References

	Year	Citations

Page 1