Annals of Pharmacotherapy · 2012 · 46 citations · 28 references
PharmacyInfectious DiseasesPharmacotherapyAntimicrobial PharmacotherapyAntimicrobial ResistanceMedical MicrobiologyAntibacterial TherapyAntibiotic Prescribing PrinciplesAntibiotic ResistanceCombination Antimicrobial TherapyEmpiric Antimicrobial TherapyAppropriate Empiric TherapyCost Savings AnalysisCost Savings EvaluationMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection TreatmentMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus TreatmentMinimum Inhibitory Concentration DeterminationStaphylococcal Infection Therapy
BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that agents other than vancomycin be considered for some types of infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) when the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) to vancomycin is 2 μg/mL or more. Alternative therapeutic options include daptomycin and linezolid, 2 relatively new and expensive drugs, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX), an old and inexpensive agent. OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy and potential cost savings associated with use of TMP/SMX compared to linezolid and daptomycin. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center. For calendar year 2009, unique adults (age >18 years) with infections due to MRSA with an MIC to vancomycin of 2 μg/mL were included if they received 2 or more doses of TMP/SMX and/or daptomycin and/or linezolid. Data were abstracted from patient charts and pharmacy records. RESULTS: There were 328 patients included in the study cohort: 143 received TMP/SMX alone, 89 received daptomycin alone, 75 received linezolid alone, and 21 patients received a combination of 2 or more of these agents. In univariate analysis, patients who received TMP/SMX alone had significantly better outcomes, including in-hospital (p = 0.003) and 90-day mortality (p < 0.001) compared to patients treated with daptomycin or linezolid. Patients receiving TMP/SMX were also younger (p < 0.001), had fewer comorbid conditions (p < 0.001), had less severe acute severity of illness (p < 0.001), and received appropriate therapy more rapidly (p = 0.001). In multivariate models the association between TMP/SMX treatment and mortality was no longer significant. Antimicrobial cost savings associated with using TMP/SMX averaged $2067.40 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: TMP/SMX monotherapy compared favorably to linezolid and daptomycin in terms of treatment efficacy and mortality. Use of TMP/SMX instead of linezolid or daptomycin could potentially significantly reduce antibiotic costs. TMP/SMX should be considered for the treatment of MRSA infection with MIC of 2 μg/mL to vancomycin.
28
R. Phillip Dellinger, Mitchell M. Levy, Andrew Rhodes et al. · Critical Care Medicine · 2013 · 9.7K citations
Veterinary Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Internal Medicine +9
Catherine Liu, Arnold S. Bayer, Sara E. Cosgrove et al. · Clinical Infectious Diseases · 2011 · 4.2K citations · Full text