Journal of Nuclear Medicine · 2013 · 53 citations · 21 references
MedicineNuclear MedicineRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyNeuro-oncologyBrain ImagingBrain TumorsMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuro-oncologic ImagingNeuro-oncology ImagingPositron Emission TomographyCost-effectivenessGlioblastoma ImagingImaging CostsIncremental Cost EstimationOncologic Pet ImagingPet-magnetic Resonance ImagingStructural Brain ImagingTumor Progression Monitoring
UNLABELLED: To date, the use of structural MR imaging (including contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-weighted images) is the standard method to diagnose tumor progression and to assess antiangiogenic treatment effects. However, several studies have suggested that O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) PET adds valuable clinical information to the information derived from structural MR imaging alone. We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the addition of (18)F-FET PET to structural MR imaging for the management of treatment with bevacizumab and irinotecan (BEV/IR) in patients with recurrent high-grade glioma compared with MR imaging alone from the perspective of the German Statutory Health Insurance. METHODS: To evaluate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the additional use of (18)F-FET PET, a decision tree model was used. Effectiveness of (18)F-FET PET was defined as correct identification of both tumor progression before BEV/IR treatment initiation and BEV/IR treatment response and was evaluated for the combination of (18)F-FET PET and MR imaging compared with MR imaging alone. Costs were estimated for a baseline scenario and for a more expensive scenario. The robustness of the results was tested using deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The use of (18)F-FET PET resulted in a number needed to diagnose of 2.4, that is, 3 additional patients have to be diagnosed to avoid 1 wrong diagnosis. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of (18)F-FET PET/MR imaging compared with MR imaging alone was €5,725 (€1 ≈ $1.30) for the baseline scenario and €8,145 for the more expensive scenario per additional correct diagnosis. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of the results. CONCLUSION: The model suggests that the additional use of (18)F-FET PET in the management of patients with recurrent high-grade glioma treated with BEV/IR may be cost-effective. Integration of (18)F-FET PET has the potential to avoid overtreatment and corresponding costs, as well as unnecessary side effects to the patient.
21
Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Roger Stupp, Warren Mason, Martin J. van den Bent et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 21.6K citations · Full text
Bevacizumab Alone and in Combination With Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma
Henry S. Friedman, Michael D. Prados, Patrick Y. Wen et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 2.4K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.
David R. Macdonald, T L Cascino, S. Clifford Schold et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1990 · 2.4K citations
Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan in Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme
James J. Vredenburgh, Annick Desjardins, James E. Herndon et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2007 · 1.4K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacotherapy +17