Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: Assessment of 1-D visco-elastic simulations against in vitro measurements

424

Citations

41

References

2011

Year

TLDR

The study evaluated nonlinear one‑dimensional pressure and flow wave equations in a 1:1 replica of the 37 largest human conduit arteries, using directly measured parameters and no data fitting. Adding wall visco‑elasticity reduced high‑frequency oscillations and lowered average RMS errors from 3.0 % to 2.5 % for pressure and from 15.7 % to 10.8 % for flow, confirming the accuracy of 1‑D reduced modelling. Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: Assessment of 1‑D numerical simulations against in vitro measurements, J.

Abstract

The accuracy of the nonlinear one-dimensional (1-D) equations of pressure and flow wave propagation in Voigt-type visco-elastic arteries was tested against measurements in a well-defined experimental 1:1 replica of the 37 largest conduit arteries in the human systemic circulation. The parameters required by the numerical algorithm were directly measured in the in vitro setup and no data fitting was involved. The inclusion of wall visco-elasticity in the numerical model reduced the underdamped high-frequency oscillations obtained using a purely elastic tube law, especially in peripheral vessels, which was previously reported in this paper [Matthys et al., 2007. Pulse wave propagation in a model human arterial network: Assessment of 1-D numerical simulations against in vitro measurements. J. Biomech. 40, 3476–3486]. In comparison to the purely elastic model, visco-elasticity significantly reduced the average relative root-mean-square errors between numerical and experimental waveforms over the 70 locations measured in the in vitro model: from 3.0% to 2.5% (p<0.012) for pressure and from 15.7% to 10.8% (p<0.002) for the flow rate. In the frequency domain, average relative errors between numerical and experimental amplitudes from the 5th to the 20th harmonic decreased from 0.7% to 0.5% (p<0.107) for pressure and from 7.0% to 3.3% (p<10−6) for the flow rate. These results provide additional support for the use of 1-D reduced modelling to accurately simulate clinically relevant problems at a reasonable computational cost.

References

YearCitations

Page 1