Negative cytology preceding cervical cancer: causes and prevention.

Abstract

Current methods of quality assurance will not remedy these defects in the screening process. It is the responsibility of laboratories to identify sources of poor smears and liaise with smear takers to ensure an improvement in quality. Assessment of the quality of smears received by a laboratory should become an important part of audit. Staff training should place more emphasis on the interpretation of "microbiopsies". The adoption of a quick scanning technique before conventional screening would probably also substantially reduce false negative results.