Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · 1999 · 1.4K citations · 181 references
Life SciencesEcologyCommunity EcologyPlant EcologyTerrestrial EcologyArid Land EcologyBiodiversityDesert EcologyEcosystem ProductivityBiodiversity-productivity RelationshipsDiversity-productivity RelationshipsEcosystem Productivity RelationshipsHierarchyProductivity-richness RelationshipSpecies Richness ResponsesTaxonomic Hierarchy
The relationship between species richness and productivity is generally considered hump‑shaped, yet mechanisms and scale effects remain debated. The study investigates how changes in species number, independent of adding productive species, affect ecosystem productivity. A review of ~200 studies found the relationship to be highly variable—30 % unimodal, 26 % positive, 12 % negative, and 32 % non‑significant—indicating that diversity–productivity patterns are inconsistent and scale‑dependent.
▪ Abstract Recent overviews have suggested that the relationship between species richness and productivity (rate of conversion of resources to biomass per unit area per unit time) is unimodal (hump-shaped). Most agree that productivity affects species richness at large scales, but unanimity is less regarding underlying mechanisms. Recent studies have examined the possibility that variation in species richness within communities may influence productivity, leading to an exploration of the relative effect of alterations in species number per se as contrasted to the addition of productive species. Reviews of the literature concerning deserts, boreal forests, tropical forests, lakes, and wetlands lead to the conclusion that extant data are insufficient to conclusively resolve the relationship between diversity and productivity, or that patterns are variable with mechanisms equally varied and complex. A more comprehensive survey of the ecological literature uncovered approximately 200 relationships, of which 30% were unimodal, 26% were positive linear, 12% were negative linear, and 32% were not significant. Categorization of studies with respect to geographic extent, ecological extent, taxonomic hierarchy, or energetic basis of productivity similarly yielded a heterogeneous distribution of relationships. Theoretical and empirical approaches increasingly suggest scale-dependence in the relationship between species richness and productivity; consequently, synthetic understanding may be contingent on explicit considerations of scale in analytical studies of productivity and diversity.
181
Species diversity in space and time
Choice Reviews Online · 1996 · 4.6K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +12
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
Robert H. MacArthur, Eric R. Pianka · The American Naturalist · 1966 · 4.5K citations
Life Sciences, Ecology, Zoology +15
Resource Competition and Community Structure.
John L. Harper, David Tilman · Journal of Ecology · 1983 · 4.2K citations
Life Sciences, Natural Resource Economics, Resource Economics +14
The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants.
P. W. Richards, Charles Elton · Journal of Ecology · 1959 · 3.9K citations